Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Ryan Peniston Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs R. Peniston

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

151

C. Rank

217

128

Best Rank

123

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$263.4K

Plays

Left-Handed

Ryan Peniston

GBR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

151

C. Rank

217

128

Best Rank

123

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$263.4K

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Wong 2 - 0 Peniston

They have played 4 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4 and Ryan Peniston winning 0. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ryan Peniston was at the Birmingham Challenger, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	2
Peniston	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Birmingham Challenger(06-01-25)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ryan Peniston

(R2) Shanghai Challenger(09-04-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ryan Peniston

C. L. C. Wong vs R. Peniston H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	R. Peniston
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$263,350
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	61.66% (365-227)
1	Grass	0
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	10
2	Total H2H Matches	0
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. L. C. Wong vs R. Peniston Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19% of points on their second serve, while Ryan Peniston has won 40.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 45.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ryan Peniston has won 48.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.37% and 29.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ryan Peniston has saved 52.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Ryan Peniston winning 69.74% (W/L 53/23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Ryan Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 220/108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 51% (W/L 36/34).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Ryan Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.79% of matches (W/L 27/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 times and Ryan Peniston being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4 and Ryan Peniston winning 0.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ryan Peniston was at the Birmingham Challenger, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:55.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.39 while Ryan Peniston has played against players with an average rank of 396.95.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ryan Peniston has won 77% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 34.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ryan Peniston has converted 38.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Ryan Peniston Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs R. Peniston H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	R. Peniston
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
25	Games Won	15
11	Aces (Total)	6
1	Total Double Faults	5
1:26:55	Average Match Time	1:26:55
70% (88/125)	1st Serve %	62% (74/120)
77% (68/88)	1st Serve Win %	64% (47/74)
57% (21/37)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (23/46)
40% (6/15)	Break Pts Won %	33% (2/6)
42% (50/120)	Return Points Win %	29% (36/125)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Peniston Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Elias YmerE. Ymer	L	6-2 6-7(4) 1-1 ret.	Stats
Matsuyama Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
QF Duje AjdukovicD. Ajdukovic	W	7-5 3-6 6-2	Stats
R2 Shunsuke NakagawaS. Nakagawa	W	6-2 6-7(5) 6-3	Stats
R1 Takuya KumasakaT. Kumasaka	W	6-0 6-1	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs R. Peniston Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	R. Peniston
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	61.66% (365/227)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	59.58% (799/542)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	54.56% (6719/5596)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	67.07% (220/108)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	57.53% (42/31)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.37% (67/54)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	51.43% (36/34)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.19
1687	Aces Total	1143
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
603	Total Double Faults	1307
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:23:49
371.13	Average Opponent Rank	433.97
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	62% (19622/31582)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	68% (13261/19622)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (6071/11960)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (1640/3783)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	43% (13938/32713)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	25.00% (4/12)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	41.18% (7/10)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	54.39% (124/104)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	69.70% (230/100)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (358/579)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (67/130)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (90/161)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (361/319)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (361/42)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (231/47)